Data and source review: Evaluate PFAS results, well records, water quality, production capacity, site conditions, and drinking-water requirements.
Alternatives: Compare granular activated carbon, ion exchange, membrane treatment, blending, operational changes, and deeper-aquifer source development feasibility.
Cost evaluation: Develop planning-level capital, operating, and life-cycle costs, with a recommended strategy and implementation schedule.
Deliverables: Provide technical memoranda, draft and final study reports, and editable supporting exhibits. Final report must be signed and sealed by a Utah-licensed Professional Engineer and completed by October 1, 2027.
Scope limits: Additional sampling, pilot testing, drilling, surveying, geotechnical work, and detailed design require separate authorization.
XL Eagle